[KwartzLab] Noisebridge & Techshop team up on a 3D printer
Chris Bruner
cbruner at quadro.net
Fri Sep 14 15:49:49 EDT 2012
Since we are comparing, this is one that I've had my eye on for a while.
http://printrbot.com/shop/plus/
8x8x8 build volume, laser cut birch construction,
no info on speeds
This was originally a kickstarter project.
Or a new one coming out, that is designed to be for normal everyday home
use. http://makibox.com/
I'm thinking this one might be good because it isn't supposed to be fiddly.
On 9/14/2012 3:10 PM, doug moen wrote:
> Compared to the Ultimaker, it has a slightly larger build volume.
> 210x210x220 vs 230x230x230. Replicator is 245x145x150.
>
> Both machines are designed for PLA, but can also print ABS. Replicator
> is designed for ABS and has a heated build platform.
>
> Ultimaker is much faster. Ultimaker speeds: head moves up to 400 mm/s,
> prints at up to 150mm/s. Type A: 250 mm/s and 90 mm/s. The bowden
> cable design makes the Ultimaker print head much lighter, which
> enables faster head motion. Replicator claims a recommended print
> speed of 40 mm/s. You can go faster, but MakerBot is very concerned
> about reliability, and provides conservative specs that work for any
> print job. The other guys tell you how fast the machine can print when
> it is on the edge of shaking itself apart, so the specs aren't
> directly comparable, in my opinion.
>
> Print resolution is probably comparable: you can achieve really high
> model-specific resolutions if you invest enough time tuning for a
> specific print job, but 100 micron layers are as far as most people go
> without doing a lot of fiddling, on any printer of this type. Type A
> reports experimental builds with special software at 50 micron layer
> height; 40 microns was reported a year ago for Ultimaker and I don't
> know if that's been exceeded yet.
>
> Ultimaker needs periodic tuning to keep it working. The Type A is
> preassembled, and has the potential to be less fiddly (comparable to a
> Replicator), but there's not enough information about reliability.
>
> Type A is cheaper in North America. Ultimaker is shipped from Europe,
> and is about $2000 all in, with shipping and duty.
>
> Doug.
>
> On 14 September 2012 14:06, Jeff Schmidt <digitalfalcon at rogers.com
> <mailto:digitalfalcon at rogers.com>> wrote:
>
> How does it compare to the Ultimaker?
>
> - Jeff
>
> On Sep 14, 2012, at 1:03 PM, doug moen <doug at moens.org
> <mailto:doug at moens.org>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ben. Thanks for pointing this out, as it pushes all of my
>> buttons (pre-assembled, and they claim good mechanical design and
>> reliable, fast, high quality output). If it is capable of
>> matching a $2000 MakerBot Replicator in terms of reliability and
>> output quality, then I'm very interested. The specs are certainly
>> good. I just want to see reports from independent reviewers.
>>
>> Doug.
>>
>> On 14 September 2012 08:51, Ben Brown <ben at kwartzlab.ca
>> <mailto:ben at kwartzlab.ca>> wrote:
>>
>> 1.75mm, 230mm3 build area, $1200:
>>
>> http://typeamachines.com/details
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at kwartzlab.ca <mailto:Discuss at kwartzlab.ca>
>> http://kwartzlab.ca/mailman/listinfo/discuss_kwartzlab.ca
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at kwartzlab.ca <mailto:Discuss at kwartzlab.ca>
>> http://kwartzlab.ca/mailman/listinfo/discuss_kwartzlab.ca
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at kwartzlab.ca <mailto:Discuss at kwartzlab.ca>
> http://kwartzlab.ca/mailman/listinfo/discuss_kwartzlab.ca
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at kwartzlab.ca
> http://kwartzlab.ca/mailman/listinfo/discuss_kwartzlab.ca
--
Chris Bruner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kwartzlab.ca/pipermail/discuss_kwartzlab.ca/attachments/20120914/37f87dd3/attachment.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list